...how well they fit in with the room decor...
Scott R. Foster wrote:No.. but peeps don't mind the LF being a bit longer. In fact I think we expect and enjoy longer RT for lower frequiencies.
jonessy wrote:Scott R. Foster wrote:No.. but peeps don't mind the LF being a bit longer. In fact I think we expect and enjoy longer RT for lower frequiencies.
According to Beranek, at least for concert halls, the RT should be a bit longer for LF.
He describes it as a parameter called 'Bass Ratio' (BR), which measures the ratio between LF and LMF.
I have the formula somewhere in my library.
Should anybody care about this, I'll look it up.
Jon.
Rod Gervais wrote:Scott,
Great post (as usual)
Joel,
If I want to purchase room treatments - and I consider yours and some other company's - in the end - it isn't going to matter to me what you call your treatment - in fact - 99% of the people who buy treatments have no interest in what they are - how they work - what type of mechanisms alter the sound in their room..........
All they care about is that the remedy will fix the illness - the cost per unit to make that happen - and how well they fit in with the room decor...........
I have a lot of work under my belt - and I know that the owners eyes glaze over the minute I have to get technical (which sometimes makes answering a question they ask difficult).................. all they want as the answer is specifically what is the fix...
If I tell them it's a membrane absorber - they look at me like I had 2 heads.......... If I told them it was your "sound traps" they'd smile and say "get er done".............
Sincerely,
Rod
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests