Primacoustic MaxTrap

Post and discuss acoustic topics, Studio design, construction, and soundproofing here

Primacoustic MaxTrap

Postby Bob » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:52 am

Just wondering what everyone thinks of
(both the page, and the device)
Posts: 4358
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:37 am
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Re: Primacoustic MaxTrap

Postby bert stoltenborg » Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:24 am

Lots of words, maybe I read 'm all later, but when they compare low and high frequencies and they say low has more energy they seem to forget that in the time one low cycle developes, a load of high cycles already have developed. So the energy is equal.
High frequencies normally are bundled and beamed by horns and line arrays while low is omni directional. So low needs more power, unless you use an enormous amount of low freq speakers like Stage Accompany did long ago during a Vangelis concert at the shores of the Maas in Rotterdam (it was the Eureka concert in 1991). The used 500.000 Watts of Blue Boxes for a 275.000 headed audience.They needed very little power in the lows compared to the highs.

And a tuned absorber still has high Q, so it will do (almost) nothing for other frequencies than the tuning frequency, and damping it to make it more broad band will kill it's effectivity.
Maybe they try to reduce costs at Riverbank and hired some Mexican techs who never saw measurements before? :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
If you view life with the knowledge that there are no problems, only opportunities, you are a marketing manager.......this is my personal philosophy
bert stoltenborg
Posts: 4555
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 11:03 am
Location: Achterhood, Netherlands

Re: Primacoustic MaxTrap

Postby Ido » Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:05 pm

it's funny how after all these years I can still get annoyed by these things.
the data for 3" wool is incorrect (from memory) and serves potential bias.
the light density=minimal LF absorption is as we know highly inaccurate.
the way of showing those resonance peaks is like propaganda.
the british have been doing these limp mass LF sorbers for dozens of years, maybe all the techs there fainted so hard they passed all the tests to riverbanks so they could faint too
Posts: 2201
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:47 pm
Location: Israel

Return to Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest