I like that.Also add a title section were you retake all relevant data, which is than copied with it.
Measures room,
Floorspace
Total boundary surface
Volume.
Bob the new parts added with the colors does not work on all browsers. I have only seen it work in IE on XP so far. It does not work on firefox on xp, or any of the mac browsers that I checked before I left to work. I would test it on Firefox and then IE if works on both of those chances are it works on most browsers and OS's. If want to use a mac for testing I could set up something to allow you to access one remotely.
Bob wrote:Dan:
And Jeff said that they could be more powerful or less or equal or whatever. Leo Beranek has an example where the tangentals and obliques are stronger than the axials.
Bob wrote:Dan:
My position is that it doesn't matter who's right. What is irrelevent is which is the stronger mode group: axial, tangential, oblique.
Because for example if you believe Everest and have a strong axial and a weak tangential that are within 1hz of each other, they're going to add to make something stronger than the axial alone (at some spots in the room?). So the fact that the tangental exists is still important, even if at half the strength. So it's important to know the frequency of all modes. A post-build measured resulting mode's strength will be determined by other things.
So if you mean THAT graph that's my design
Bob wrote:I have a question about Walker. I've seen these two formulas on the www
1.1w / h < l / h < 4.5w / (h - 4)
1.1w / h < l / h < (4.5w / h) - 4
Which one is right?
Bob wrote:Hello
I have a question about Walker. I've seen these two formulas on the www
1.1w / h < l / h < 4.5w / (h - 4)
1.1w / h < l / h < (4.5w / h) - 4
Which one is right?
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest